Travel Haji Murah di Pontianak Hubungi 021-9929-2337 atau 0821-2406-5740 Alhijaz Indowisata adalah perusahaan swasta nasional yang bergerak di bidang tour dan travel. Nama Alhijaz terinspirasi dari istilah dua kota suci bagi umat islam pada zaman nabi Muhammad saw. yaitu Makkah dan Madinah. Dua kota yang penuh berkah sehingga diharapkan menular dalam kinerja perusahaan. Sedangkan Indowisata merupakan akronim dari kata indo yang berarti negara Indonesia dan wisata yang menjadi fokus usaha bisnis kami.

Travel Haji Murah di Pontianak Alhijaz Indowisata didirikan oleh Bapak H. Abdullah Djakfar Muksen pada tahun 2010. Merangkak dari kecil namun pasti, alhijaz berkembang pesat dari mulai penjualan tiket maskapai penerbangan domestik dan luar negeri, tour domestik hingga mengembangkan ke layanan jasa umrah dan haji khusus. Tak hanya itu, pada tahun 2011 Alhijaz kembali membuka divisi baru yaitu provider visa umrah yang bekerja sama dengan muassasah arab saudi. Sebagai komitmen legalitas perusahaan dalam melayani pelanggan dan jamaah secara aman dan profesional, saat ini perusahaan telah mengantongi izin resmi dari pemerintah melalui kementrian pariwisata, lalu izin haji khusus dan umrah dari kementrian agama. Selain itu perusahaan juga tergabung dalam komunitas organisasi travel nasional seperti Asita, komunitas penyelenggara umrah dan haji khusus yaitu HIMPUH dan organisasi internasional yaitu IATA.

Travel Haji Murah di Pontianak

saco-indonesia.com, Intel Kodam VI Mulawarman bersama personel TNI dari Komando Rayon Militer (Koramil) Penajam, Kabupaten Penaj

saco-indonesia.com, Intel Kodam VI Mulawarman bersama personel TNI dari Komando Rayon Militer (Koramil) Penajam, Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara, Kalimantan Timur, telah berhasil menangkap tiga intel gadungan di Kelurahan Sotek.

Komandan Koramil Penajam Kapten Inf Laety juga mengatakan tiga intel gadungan itu antara lain; Su'eab Purnama Zahri (19), Aminullah (35), dan Suranto (38). Ketiganya merupakan warga Kabupaten Penajam Paser Utara.

Selain telah berhasil menangkap tiga pelaku, personel gabungan juga telah berhasil mengamankan satu unit mobil KT 1330 MV dan uang Rp 2,8 juta yang diduga hasil pemerasan dari para sopir truk.

"Kami juga telah berhasil mengamankan atribut serta laptop dan baju seragam mirip TNI. Ketiga pelaku juga merupakan anggota salah satu ormas," kata Laety di Samarinda, Rabu (12/2) kemarin.

Penangkapan tentara gadungan itu, berdasarkan informasi masyarakat yang diterima intel Kodam bersama Bintara Pembina Desa (Babinsa) bahwa ada tiga orang yang juga mengaku intel TNI.

Pelaku telah memeras dengan meminta sejumlah uang kepada tiga sopir truk yang sedang membawa kayu. "Ketiga pelaku yang menggunakan seragam TNI itu juga menghentikan setiap truk yang melewati wilayah Sotek. Setelah mengetahui mengangkut kayu, kemudian meminta surat-surat kepada sopir. Jika sopir tidak bisa menunjukkan dokumen pengangkutan kayu, maka mereka langsung bernegosiasi dengan meminta sejumlah uang. Sopir pertama dan kedua itu menyerahkan uang masing-masing Rp 1,3 juta dan sopir ketiga hanya memberi Rp 200.000," ujar Laety.

Setelah mengetahui aksi pelaku tersebut, katanya, personel intel Kodam bersama Babinsa melakukan razia di wilayah Sotek dan telah berhasil menghentikan mobil yang digunakan pelaku.

"Saat diamankan, ketiganya tidak melakukan perlawanan dan di dalam kendaraan mereka ditemukan seragam TNI dan tas serta dua buah sangkur," katanya.

Selain melakukan pemerasan, katanya, tiga pelaku tersebut telah melakukan kampanye secara terbatas kepada sejumlah masyarakat. "Kampanye yang mereka lakukan dengan meminta warga memilih salah satu partai politik (parpol) termasuk calon presiden (capres), sehingga warga menilai bahwa TNI tidak netral dalam pemilu nanti," katanya.

"Tindakan mereka itu jelas juga merugikan TNI, karena berkali-kali pimpinan TNI juga mengatakan bahwa dalam pemilu nanti akan bersikap netral. Dengan tindakan mereka mengampanyekan salah satu capres dan parpol, jelas masyarakat menilai bahwa TNI tidak netral," kata Laety.

Setelah dilakukan pemeriksaan, katanya, tiga pelaku itu, selanjutnya akan diserahkan kepada kepolisian untuk dapat ditindaklanjuti dan diproses sesuai hukum.

"Kami juga telah meminta kepada masyarakat, bila ada yang mengatasnamakan TNI dalam melakukan pemerasan, silakan dilaporkan. Kami juga akan memberikan tindakan," kata Laety.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

KPK tengah menelusuri peran pengacara-pengacara Gubernur Banten Ratu Atut Chosiyah. Pengacara-pengacara itu diduga telah menghalang-halangi penyidikan di KPK.

KPK tengah menelusuri peran pengacara-pengacara Gubernur Banten Ratu Atut Chosiyah. Pengacara-pengacara itu diduga telah menghalang-halangi penyidikan di KPK.

"Masih ditelusuri," ujar Ketua KPK Abraham Samad, di kantornya, Rabu (19/3).

Abraham juga menegaskan jika terbukti para pengacara ini menghalang-halangi penyidikan, maka dapat dijerat pidana oleh KPK. Termasuk menyembunyikan saksi.

"Bisa (dipidanakan)," ujar Abraham menegaskan.

Sementara itu, Wakil Ketua KPK Bambang Widjojanto juga menjelaskan modus para pengacara Atut yang telah menghalangi proses penyidikan di KPK yakni dengan mengarahkan salah satu saksi di kasus tersebut.

"Saya kasih indikasi modusnya. Salah satunya adalah mengarahkan saksi. Supaya kamu lakukan ini saja, kamu bersembunyi saja, kayak-kayak gitu. Kan itu gak boleh saksi disuruh bersembunyi begitu kan. Kalau ada apa-apa, saya yang tanggung jawab. Nah misalnya kayak begitu," ujar Bambang.

Bambang juga menegaskan para pengacara itu bisa terjerat Pasal 21 UU Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Ancaman hukumannya yakni pidana penjara paling lama 12 tahun dan denda paling banyak Rp 600 juta.

Sayangnya, Abraham maupun Bambang juga tidak mengatakan siapa saja pengacara Atut yang diduga telah menghalangi proses penyidikan tersebut. Yang pasti, KPK juga akan segera menjerat pengacara itu setelah memiliki 2 alat bukti yang cukup.

"Kita butuh waktu untuk dapat menemukan alat bukti apakah pengacara ini bisa di kenakan sebagai tersangka menghalang-halangi. Jadi ini belum bukan tidak," ujarnya.

Diketahui, ada beberapa pengacara yang menjadi tim advokasi Ratu Atut, di antaranya, Rudy Alfonso, Tubagus Sukatma, Fajar, Efran Hilmi dan Andi Simangunsong.

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Imagine an elite professional services firm with a high-performing, workaholic culture. Everyone is expected to turn on a dime to serve a client, travel at a moment’s notice, and be available pretty much every evening and weekend. It can make for a grueling work life, but at the highest levels of accounting, law, investment banking and consulting firms, it is just the way things are.

Except for one dirty little secret: Some of the people ostensibly turning in those 80- or 90-hour workweeks, particularly men, may just be faking it.

Many of them were, at least, at one elite consulting firm studied by Erin Reid, a professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. It’s impossible to know if what she learned at that unidentified consulting firm applies across the world of work more broadly. But her research, published in the academic journal Organization Science, offers a way to understand how the professional world differs between men and women, and some of the ways a hard-charging culture that emphasizes long hours above all can make some companies worse off.

Photo
 
Credit Peter Arkle

Ms. Reid interviewed more than 100 people in the American offices of a global consulting firm and had access to performance reviews and internal human resources documents. At the firm there was a strong culture around long hours and responding to clients promptly.

“When the client needs me to be somewhere, I just have to be there,” said one of the consultants Ms. Reid interviewed. “And if you can’t be there, it’s probably because you’ve got another client meeting at the same time. You know it’s tough to say I can’t be there because my son had a Cub Scout meeting.”

Some people fully embraced this culture and put in the long hours, and they tended to be top performers. Others openly pushed back against it, insisting upon lighter and more flexible work hours, or less travel; they were punished in their performance reviews.

The third group is most interesting. Some 31 percent of the men and 11 percent of the women whose records Ms. Reid examined managed to achieve the benefits of a more moderate work schedule without explicitly asking for it.

They made an effort to line up clients who were local, reducing the need for travel. When they skipped work to spend time with their children or spouse, they didn’t call attention to it. One team on which several members had small children agreed among themselves to cover for one another so that everyone could have more flexible hours.

A male junior manager described working to have repeat consulting engagements with a company near enough to his home that he could take care of it with day trips. “I try to head out by 5, get home at 5:30, have dinner, play with my daughter,” he said, adding that he generally kept weekend work down to two hours of catching up on email.

Despite the limited hours, he said: “I know what clients are expecting. So I deliver above that.” He received a high performance review and a promotion.

What is fascinating about the firm Ms. Reid studied is that these people, who in her terminology were “passing” as workaholics, received performance reviews that were as strong as their hyper-ambitious colleagues. For people who were good at faking it, there was no real damage done by their lighter workloads.

It calls to mind the episode of “Seinfeld” in which George Costanza leaves his car in the parking lot at Yankee Stadium, where he works, and gets a promotion because his boss sees the car and thinks he is getting to work earlier and staying later than anyone else. (The strategy goes awry for him, and is not recommended for any aspiring partners in a consulting firm.)

A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.

The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.

It would be dangerous to extrapolate too much from a study at one firm, but Ms. Reid said in an interview that since publishing a summary of her research in Harvard Business Review she has heard from people in a variety of industries describing the same dynamic.

High-octane professional service firms are that way for a reason, and no one would doubt that insane hours and lots of travel can be necessary if you’re a lawyer on the verge of a big trial, an accountant right before tax day or an investment banker advising on a huge merger.

But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.

In other words, maybe the real problem isn’t men faking greater devotion to their jobs. Maybe it’s that too many companies reward the wrong things, favoring the illusion of extraordinary effort over actual productivity.

Artikel lainnya »