Paket Promo Umroh 2016 di Samarinda Hubungi 021-9929-2337 atau 0821-2406-5740 Alhijaz Indowisata adalah perusahaan swasta nasional yang bergerak di bidang tour dan travel. Nama Alhijaz terinspirasi dari istilah dua kota suci bagi umat islam pada zaman nabi Muhammad saw. yaitu Makkah dan Madinah. Dua kota yang penuh berkah sehingga diharapkan menular dalam kinerja perusahaan. Sedangkan Indowisata merupakan akronim dari kata indo yang berarti negara Indonesia dan wisata yang menjadi fokus usaha bisnis kami.

Paket Promo Umroh 2016 di Samarinda Alhijaz Indowisata didirikan oleh Bapak H. Abdullah Djakfar Muksen pada tahun 2010. Merangkak dari kecil namun pasti, alhijaz berkembang pesat dari mulai penjualan tiket maskapai penerbangan domestik dan luar negeri, tour domestik hingga mengembangkan ke layanan jasa umrah dan haji khusus. Tak hanya itu, pada tahun 2011 Alhijaz kembali membuka divisi baru yaitu provider visa umrah yang bekerja sama dengan muassasah arab saudi. Sebagai komitmen legalitas perusahaan dalam melayani pelanggan dan jamaah secara aman dan profesional, saat ini perusahaan telah mengantongi izin resmi dari pemerintah melalui kementrian pariwisata, lalu izin haji khusus dan umrah dari kementrian agama. Selain itu perusahaan juga tergabung dalam komunitas organisasi travel nasional seperti Asita, komunitas penyelenggara umrah dan haji khusus yaitu HIMPUH dan organisasi internasional yaitu IATA.

Paket Promo Umroh 2016 di Samarinda

Yakinkah kita bahwa kita sanggup berangkat umroh tahun ini? bagaimanapun keadaan kita? Adakah kita berpikir seperti

Yakinkah kita bahwa kita sanggup berangkat umroh tahun ini? bagaimanapun keadaan kita?

Adakah kita berpikir seperti ini?
“ah, keadaanku saja masih seperti ini, gaji sebulan saja habis untuk kebutuhan hidup sehari – hari, itu saja masih ngutang sana – sini, mana mungkin mah bisa berangkat umrohUmroh kan cuma untuk orang – orang yang mampu!”

Atau, “umroh itu wajib bila mampu kan, sementara aku ini saja kredit motor belum beres, rumah juga masih numpang orang tua, bagaimana mungkin bisa berangkat umroh?”

“Hai manusia, ingatlah akan nikmat Allah kepadamu. Adakah Pencipta selain Allah yang dapat memberikan rezki kepada kamu dari langit dan bumi?” (QS. Fathir: 3)

“Katakanlah: “Siapakah yang memberi rezeki kepadamu dari langit dan dari bumi?” Katakanlah: “Allah.” (QS. Saba’: 24)

“Sesungguhnya Tuhanmu melapangkan rezki kepada siapa yang Dia kehendaki dan menyempitkannya; Sesungguhnya Dia Maha mengetahui lagi Maha melihat akan hamba-hamba-Nya.” (QS. Al Isro’: 30)

Ketika kita membaca, memahami dan menyerapi ayat – ayat yang telah Allah wahyukan melalui Rasul kita, Muhammad SAW, tersebut diatas. apakah kita masih ragu? masihkah kita ragu terhadap kuasa Allah SWT?

Mari kita bersama – sama tingkatkan iman kita terhadap Allah SWT dan Rasul-Nya, pantaskan diri dengan perbaikan ibadah kita serta yakinkan diri bahwa tidak ada yang tidak mungkin ketika Allah SWT sudah berkehendak.

Semoga Allah memudahkan langkah kita, melapangkan rezeki kita dan mengundang kita untuk berangkat ke Baitullah. Aamiin

saco-indonesia.com Merawat tanaman bunga dalam pot Tanaman hias dalam pot adalah pilihan yang sangat tepat bagi Anda yang

saco-indonesia.com

Merawat tanaman bunga dalam pot

Tanaman hias dalam pot adalah pilihan yang sangat tepat bagi Anda yang telah memiliki luas taman terbatas. Rumah Anda akan makin sempurna dengan kehadiran tanaman tersebut. Hanya saja, merawat bunga dalam pot sangat berbeda dalam merawat tanaman di alam terbuka. Sebab dari segi media, ruang yang telah disediakan untuk tanaman hanya sebatas pada ukuran pot saja. Bagi Anda pecinta tanaman hias dalam pot, berikut ini kami akan berikan tips perawatannya:
Pertama, media tanam. Hindari dengan menggunakan media tanam hanya berupa tanah saja.  Namun gunakan juga media tanam campuran sesuai dengan jenis tanaman yang akan ditanam. Sebelum media tanam dimasukkan ke dalam pot, lapisi bagian bawahnya dengan menggunakan styrofoam. Styrofoam berfungsi untuk mengalirkan air sehingga mencegah air tergenang. Jika air tergenang, maka tanah menjadi padat.. Hal ini juga akan menyebabkan warna daun menjadi kuning, layu, atau bentuknya keriting.  Selain styrofoam, Anda juga bisa menggantikannya dengan sabut kelapa.
Kedua, cahaya matahari. Perhatikan jenis tanaman hias yang Anda tanam dalam pot. Apakah termasuk yang membutuhkan cahaya matahari langsung ataukah harus ditempatkan di lokasi yang teduh. Jika jenis tanaman hias tersebut membutuhkan cahaya matahari langsung, maka Anda harus rajin menaruhnya di tempat yang terkena cahaya matahari langsung. Sebaliknya jenis tanaman teduh, sekali waktu Anda perlu menaruhnya di luar agar mendapatkan cahaya matahari langsung. Yakni minimal sekali dalam lima hari. Khusus untuk tanaman buah dalam pot serta tanaman berbunga, Anda harus memastikan tanaman tersebut terkena cahaya matahari. Sebab bila pasokan cahaya matahari kurang, maka tanaman tadi tidak akan berbunga dan sulit berbuah.
Ketiga, ukuran pot. Seiring dengan pertumbuhannya, tanaman hias dalam pot juga akan terus membesar. Jika ukurannya semakin besar, maka Anda perlu memindahkannya ke dalam pot yang ukurannya lebih besar. Namun untuk tanaman bonsai, Anda tidak perlu mengganti media tanam maupu potnya. Anda cukup menghambat pertumbuhannya dengan rajin memotong batangnya. Dengan cara ini, tanaman juga akan tetap berukuran kerdil.
Keempat, membersihkan daun. Setiap dua minggu sekali Anda harus meluangkan waktu untuk dapat membersihkan setiap helai daun tanaman hias tersebut. Bila Anda rutin melakukannya, maka setiap helai daun tersebut akan nampak mengkilat, bersih, dan juga sehat. Pembersihan permukaan daun akan membantu kelancaran proses fotosintesis karena pori-pori daun lebih bersih. Proses pembersihan daun bisa menggunakan cairan khusus (semir daun). Namun jika Anda kesulitan mendapatkannya, Anda juga bisa menggunakan susu cair. Basahi permukaan lap dengan susu cair. Lalu gosok dengan lembut setiap helai daun dengan menggunakan lap tersebut.
Kelima, pemupukan. Untuk tanaman hias berbunga, Anda harus memberinya pupuk NPK setiap bulan sekali.
Keenam, hama dan penyakit. Serangan hama dan penyakit bisa ditanggulangi dengan penyemprotan insektisida.


Editor : Dian Sukmawati

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Imagine an elite professional services firm with a high-performing, workaholic culture. Everyone is expected to turn on a dime to serve a client, travel at a moment’s notice, and be available pretty much every evening and weekend. It can make for a grueling work life, but at the highest levels of accounting, law, investment banking and consulting firms, it is just the way things are.

Except for one dirty little secret: Some of the people ostensibly turning in those 80- or 90-hour workweeks, particularly men, may just be faking it.

Many of them were, at least, at one elite consulting firm studied by Erin Reid, a professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. It’s impossible to know if what she learned at that unidentified consulting firm applies across the world of work more broadly. But her research, published in the academic journal Organization Science, offers a way to understand how the professional world differs between men and women, and some of the ways a hard-charging culture that emphasizes long hours above all can make some companies worse off.

Photo
 
Credit Peter Arkle

Ms. Reid interviewed more than 100 people in the American offices of a global consulting firm and had access to performance reviews and internal human resources documents. At the firm there was a strong culture around long hours and responding to clients promptly.

“When the client needs me to be somewhere, I just have to be there,” said one of the consultants Ms. Reid interviewed. “And if you can’t be there, it’s probably because you’ve got another client meeting at the same time. You know it’s tough to say I can’t be there because my son had a Cub Scout meeting.”

Some people fully embraced this culture and put in the long hours, and they tended to be top performers. Others openly pushed back against it, insisting upon lighter and more flexible work hours, or less travel; they were punished in their performance reviews.

The third group is most interesting. Some 31 percent of the men and 11 percent of the women whose records Ms. Reid examined managed to achieve the benefits of a more moderate work schedule without explicitly asking for it.

They made an effort to line up clients who were local, reducing the need for travel. When they skipped work to spend time with their children or spouse, they didn’t call attention to it. One team on which several members had small children agreed among themselves to cover for one another so that everyone could have more flexible hours.

A male junior manager described working to have repeat consulting engagements with a company near enough to his home that he could take care of it with day trips. “I try to head out by 5, get home at 5:30, have dinner, play with my daughter,” he said, adding that he generally kept weekend work down to two hours of catching up on email.

Despite the limited hours, he said: “I know what clients are expecting. So I deliver above that.” He received a high performance review and a promotion.

What is fascinating about the firm Ms. Reid studied is that these people, who in her terminology were “passing” as workaholics, received performance reviews that were as strong as their hyper-ambitious colleagues. For people who were good at faking it, there was no real damage done by their lighter workloads.

It calls to mind the episode of “Seinfeld” in which George Costanza leaves his car in the parking lot at Yankee Stadium, where he works, and gets a promotion because his boss sees the car and thinks he is getting to work earlier and staying later than anyone else. (The strategy goes awry for him, and is not recommended for any aspiring partners in a consulting firm.)

A second finding is that women, particularly those with young children, were much more likely to request greater flexibility through more formal means, such as returning from maternity leave with an explicitly reduced schedule. Men who requested a paternity leave seemed to be punished come review time, and so may have felt more need to take time to spend with their families through those unofficial methods.

The result of this is easy to see: Those specifically requesting a lighter workload, who were disproportionately women, suffered in their performance reviews; those who took a lighter workload more discreetly didn’t suffer. The maxim of “ask forgiveness, not permission” seemed to apply.

It would be dangerous to extrapolate too much from a study at one firm, but Ms. Reid said in an interview that since publishing a summary of her research in Harvard Business Review she has heard from people in a variety of industries describing the same dynamic.

High-octane professional service firms are that way for a reason, and no one would doubt that insane hours and lots of travel can be necessary if you’re a lawyer on the verge of a big trial, an accountant right before tax day or an investment banker advising on a huge merger.

But the fact that the consultants who quietly lightened their workload did just as well in their performance reviews as those who were truly working 80 or more hours a week suggests that in normal times, heavy workloads may be more about signaling devotion to a firm than really being more productive. The person working 80 hours isn’t necessarily serving clients any better than the person working 50.

In other words, maybe the real problem isn’t men faking greater devotion to their jobs. Maybe it’s that too many companies reward the wrong things, favoring the illusion of extraordinary effort over actual productivity.

Artikel lainnya »