Harga Haji Plus Jauari 2016 di Jakarta Hubungi 021-9929-2337 atau 0821-2406-5740 Alhijaz Indowisata adalah perusahaan swasta nasional yang bergerak di bidang tour dan travel. Nama Alhijaz terinspirasi dari istilah dua kota suci bagi umat islam pada zaman nabi Muhammad saw. yaitu Makkah dan Madinah. Dua kota yang penuh berkah sehingga diharapkan menular dalam kinerja perusahaan. Sedangkan Indowisata merupakan akronim dari kata indo yang berarti negara Indonesia dan wisata yang menjadi fokus usaha bisnis kami.
Harga Haji Plus Jauari 2016 di Jakarta Alhijaz Indowisata didirikan oleh Bapak H. Abdullah Djakfar Muksen pada tahun 2010. Merangkak dari kecil namun pasti, alhijaz berkembang pesat dari mulai penjualan tiket maskapai penerbangan domestik dan luar negeri, tour domestik hingga mengembangkan ke layanan jasa umrah dan haji khusus. Tak hanya itu, pada tahun 2011 Alhijaz kembali membuka divisi baru yaitu provider visa umrah yang bekerja sama dengan muassasah arab saudi. Sebagai komitmen legalitas perusahaan dalam melayani pelanggan dan jamaah secara aman dan profesional, saat ini perusahaan telah mengantongi izin resmi dari pemerintah melalui kementrian pariwisata, lalu izin haji khusus dan umrah dari kementrian agama. Selain itu perusahaan juga tergabung dalam komunitas organisasi travel nasional seperti Asita, komunitas penyelenggara umrah dan haji khusus yaitu HIMPUH dan organisasi internasional yaitu IATA.
Rasulullah (R) bertanya : “Apa yg kau rasakan jika melihat seseorang dari umatku hendak
Iblis (I) menj
Rasulullah (R) bertanya : “Apa
yg kau rasakan jika melihat seseorang dari umatku hendak shalat?”
menjawab: “aku merasa panas dingin dan gemetar”
I: “Sebab setiap seorang hamba besujud1X kepada Allah, Allah mengangkatnya 1
R: “jika seorang umatku berpuasa?”
terasa terikat hingga ia berbuka”
R: “jika ia berhaji?”
“aku seperti orang gila”
R: “jika ia membaca Al-Quran?”
I: “aku merasa meleleh laksana timah diatas api”
R: “jika ia
I: “itu sama saja org tsb m'belah tubuhku dgn
R: “mengapa bisa begitu?“
I: ”sebab dalam
sedekah ada 4 keuntungan baginya, yaitu :
1. Keberkahan dlm hartanya,
3. Sedekah itu kelak akan menjadi hijab antara dirinya dgn api
4. Terhindar dari segala macam musibah akan terhalau dr dirinya,
“apa yg dapat mematahkan pinggangmu?”
I: “suara kuda perang di jalan
R: “apa yg dapat melelehkan tubuhmu?”
“taubat org yg bertaubat”
R: “apa yg dpt membakar hatimu?”
I: “istigfar di waktu siang & malam”
R: “apa yg dpt
I: “sedekah yg diam2”
R: “apa yg
dpt menusuk matamu?”
I: “shalat fajar”
R: “apa yg dpt
I: “shalat berjamaah”
R: “apa yg
I: “majelis para ulama”
“bagaimana cara makanmu?”
I: “dengan tangan kiri dan jariku”
R: “dimanakah kau menaungi anak2mu di musim panas?”
R: “siapa temanmu wahai iblis?”
R: “siapa teman tidurmu?”
R: “siapa tamumu?”
R: “siapa utusanmu?”
I: “tukang sihir
R: “apa yg membuatmu gembira?”
R: “siapa kekasihmu?”
I: “org yg
meninggalkan Sholat Jum'at”
R: “siapa manusia yg paling membahagiakanmu
I: “org yg meninggalkan shalatnya dgn sengaja”
TIPS MEMBELI BAJU YANG BAIK
saco-indonesia.com, Ketika anda sudah mempersiapkan dana untuk dapat berbelanja baju, mungkin anda juga sering mengalami kesulit
saco-indonesia.com, Ketika anda sudah mempersiapkan dana untuk dapat berbelanja baju, mungkin anda juga sering mengalami kesulitan ketika harus menentukan pilihan. Mungkin tips dalam membeli baju yang baik akan bisa memberikan pencerahan kepada anda. Tak heran jika semua dipersiapkan dengan sangat matang, hasilnya pun juga begitu maksimal dan juga terlihat pas dipandang mata.
Secara umum, orang juga akan sangat mudah terpikat dengan baju model terkini, yang sedang nge-trend. Sebenarnya hal itu juga tidaklah salah namun anda juga harus mempertimbangkan aspek lainnya. jangan sampai anda membeli dengan harga yang terbiang mahal tetapi hanya penyesalan yang anda dapatkan. Mungkin berbagai tips juga sudah sering anda temukan. tetapi apa salahnya jika anda menyimak beberapa tips membeli baju ini.
Berikut beberapa tips membeli baju yang baik :
tips membeli baju
1. Perhatikan bentuk tubuh anda.
Setiap orang pasti mempunyai bentuk tubuh yang berbeda-beda. Jadi, sesuaikan antara baju yang anda beli dengan bentuk tubuh anda. Mana yang paling pas dengan bentuk tubuh anda, itulah yang aling penting.
Anda juga bisa mencoba dahulu ketika anda sedang memilih-milih baju. Perhatikan dengan seksama, apakah memang sudah pas dan benar-benar sesuai dengan bentuk tubuh anda seperti tips nomor 1 diatas.
3. Tidak harus mahal
Anda juga tidak harus membeli baju dengan harga yang mahal kok. Sudah terbukti banyak baju yang harganya biasa-biasa saja tetapi sangat nyaman dan terlihat sangat elegan ketika dipakai. Jika anda memang telah mempunyai dana yang berlebih, ya silahkan saja membeli yang berharga mahal.
4. Mencari referensi
Anda juga bisa mencari referensi dulu di internet atau media lainnya. Banyak yang telah menyediakan info mengenai baju. Tujuannya adalah agar anda sudah mempunyai gambaran mengenai baju incaran anda ketika anda meninggalkan rumah untuk membeli baju.
5. Jangan tergesa-gesa
Lebih baik sabar dan santai saja ketika anda sedang memilih baju.
6. Pendapat orang lain
Anda juga bisa mengajak seseorang dan menanyakan kira-kira baju apa yang paling cocok kepada orang lain ketika anda membeli baju, misalnya saja anda mengajak orang tua, teman, pacar bahkan designer baju sekalipun. Orang lain bisa dengan mudah menilai apakah baju tersebut cocok dan pas untuk anda.
7. Teliti sebelum membeli
Anda juga harus teliti ketika anda membeli baju. Apakah sudah benar-benar tidak ditemukan cacat pada baju yang akan anda beli.
Jika anda memang tergolong orang yang super sibuk, anda juga bisa memanfaatkan internet untuk dapat membeli baju. Untuk saat ini, toko baju online sangat mudah ditemukan. Tentu saja anda harus lebih ekstra hati-hati dan benar-benar memperhatikan kualitas dan kredibilitas toko baju online tersebut agar anda tidak tertipu dan menyesal kemudian.
Mungkin itulah beberapa tips membeli baju yang baik yang mungkin bermanfaat bagi anda. Rambut juga berpengaruh dalam penampilan anda lho. Jadi, ketika pakaian anda sudah pas dan bagus, rambut juga harus indah.
Editor : Dian Sukmawati
Dean Skelos, Albany Senate Leader, Aided Son at All Costs, U.S. Says
Over the last five years or so, it seemed there was little that Dean G. Skelos, the majority leader of the New York Senate, would not do for his son.
He pressed a powerful real estate executive to provide commissions to his son, a 32-year-old title insurance salesman, according to a federal criminal complaint. He helped get him a job at an environmental company and employed his influence to help the company get government work. He used his office to push natural gas drilling regulations that would have increased his son’s commissions.
He even tried to direct part of a $5.4 billion state budget windfall to fund government contracts that the company was seeking. And when the company was close to securing a storm-water contract from Nassau County, the senator, through an intermediary, pressured the company to pay his son more — or risk having the senator subvert the bid.
The criminal complaint, unsealed on Monday, lays out corruption charges against Senator Skelos and his son, Adam B. Skelos, the latest scandal to seize Albany, and potentially alter its power structure.
The repeated and diverse efforts by Senator Skelos, a Long Island Republican, to use what prosecutors said was his political influence to find work, or at least income, for his son could send both men to federal prison. If they are convicted of all six charges against them, they face up to 20 years in prison for each of four of the six counts and up to 10 years for the remaining two.
Senator Kenneth P. LaValle, of Long Island, who serves as chairman of the Republican conference, emerged from a closed-door meeting Monday night to say that conference members agreed that Mr. Skelos should be benefited the “presumption of innocence,” and would stay in his leadership role.
“The leader has indicated he would like to remain as leader,” said Mr. LaValle, “and he has the support of the conference.” The case against Mr. Skelos and his son grew out of a broader inquiry into political corruption by the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, that has already changed the face of the state capital. It is based in part, according to the six-count complaint, on conversations secretly recorded by one of two cooperating witnesses, and wiretaps on the cellphones of the senator and his son. Those recordings revealed that both men were concerned about electronic surveillance, and illustrated the son’s unsuccessful efforts to thwart it.
Adam Skelos took to using a “burner” phone, the complaint says, and told his father he wanted them to speak through a FaceTime video call in an apparent effort to avoid detection. They also used coded language at times.
At one point, Adam Skelos was recorded telling a Senate staff member of his frustration in not being able to speak openly to his father on the phone, noting that he could not “just send smoke signals or a little pigeon” carrying a message.
The 43-page complaint, sworn out by Paul M. Takla, a special agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlines a five-year scheme to “monetize” the senator’s official position; it also lays bare the extent to which a father sought to use his position to help his son.
The charges accuse the two men of extorting payments through a real estate developer, Glenwood Management, based on Long Island, and the environmental company, AbTech Industries, in Scottsdale, Ariz., with the expectation that the money paid to Adam Skelos — nearly $220,000 in total — would influence his father’s actions.
Glenwood, one of the state’s most prolific campaign donors, had ties to AbTech through investments in the environmental firm’s parent company by Glenwood’s founding family and a senior executive.
The accusations in the complaint portray Senator Skelos as a man who, when it came to his son, was not shy about twisting arms, even in situations that might give other arm-twisters pause.
Seeking to help his son, Senator Skelos turned to the executive at Glenwood, which develops rental apartments in New York City and has much at stake when it comes to real estate legislation in Albany. The senator urged him to direct business to his son, who sold title insurance.
After much prodding, the executive, Charles C. Dorego, engineered a $20,000 payment to Adam Skelos from a title insurance company even though he did no work for the money. But far more lucrative was a consultant position that Mr. Dorego arranged for Adam Skelos at AbTech, which seeks government contracts to treat storm water. (Mr. Dorego is not identified by name in the complaint, but referred to only as CW-1, for Cooperating Witness 1.)
Senator Skelos appeared to take an active interest in his son’s new line of work. Adam Skelos sent him several drafts of his consulting agreement with AbTech, the complaint says, as well as the final deal that was struck.
“Mazel tov,” his father replied.
Senator Skelos sent relevant news articles to his son, including one about a sewage leak near Albany. When AbTech wanted to seek government contracts after Hurricane Sandy, the senator got on a conference call with his son and an AbTech executive, Bjornulf White, and offered advice. (Like Mr. Dorego, Mr. White is not named in the complaint, but referred to as CW-2.)
The assistance paid off: With the senator’s help, AbTech secured a contract worth up to $12 million from Nassau County, a big break for a struggling small business.
But the money was slow to materialize. The senator expressed impatience with county officials.
Adam Skelos, in a phone call with Mr. White in late December, suggested that his father would seek to punish the county. “I tell you this, the state is not going to do a [expletive] thing for the county,” he said.
Three days later, Senator Skelos pressed his case with the Nassau County executive, Edward P. Mangano, a fellow Republican. “Somebody feels like they’re just getting jerked around the last two years,” the senator said, referring to his son in what the complaint described as “coded language.”
The next day, the senator pursued the matter, as he and Mr. Mangano attended a wake for a slain New York City police officer. Senator Skelos then reassured his son, who called him while he was still at the wake. “All claims that are in will be taken care of,” the senator said.
AbTech’s fortunes appeared to weigh on his son. At one point in January, Adam Skelos told his father that if the company did not succeed, he would “lose the ability to pay for things.”
Making matters worse, in recent months, Senator Skelos and his son appeared to grow wary about who was watching them. In addition to making calls on the burner phone, Adam Skelos said he used the FaceTime video calling “because that doesn’t show up on the phone bill,” as he told Mr. White.
In late February, Adam Skelos arranged a pair of meetings between Mr. White and state senators; AbTech needed to win state legislation that would allow its contract to move beyond its initial stages. But Senator Skelos deemed the plan too risky and caused one of the meetings to be canceled.
In another recorded call, Adam Skelos, promising to be “very, very vague” on the phone, urged his father to allow the meeting. The senator offered a warning. “Right now we are in dangerous times, Adam,” he told him.
A month later, in another phone call that was recorded by the authorities, Adam Skelos complained that his father could not give him “real advice” about AbTech while the two men were speaking over the telephone.
“You can’t talk normally,” he told his father, “because it’s like [expletive] Preet Bharara is listening to every [expletive] phone call. It’s just [expletive] frustrating.”
“It is,” his father agreed.
With Iran Talks, a Tangled Path to Ending Syria’s War
UNITED NATIONS — Wearing pinstripes and a pince-nez, Staffan de Mistura, the United Nations envoy for Syria, arrived at the Security Council one Tuesday afternoon in February and announced that President Bashar al-Assad had agreed to halt airstrikes over Aleppo. Would the rebels, Mr. de Mistura suggested, agree to halt their shelling?
What he did not announce, but everyone knew by then, was that the Assad government had begun a military offensive to encircle opposition-held enclaves in Aleppo and that fierce fighting was underway. It would take only a few days for rebel leaders, having pushed back Syrian government forces, to outright reject Mr. de Mistura’s proposed freeze in the fighting, dooming the latest diplomatic overture on Syria.
Diplomacy is often about appearing to be doing something until the time is ripe for a deal to be done.
Now, with Mr. Assad’s forces having suffered a string of losses on the battlefield and the United States reaching at least a partial rapprochement with Mr. Assad’s main backer, Iran, Mr. de Mistura is changing course. Starting Monday, he is set to hold a series of closed talks in Geneva with the warring sides and their main supporters. Iran will be among them.
In an interview at United Nations headquarters last week, Mr. de Mistura hinted that the changing circumstances, both military and diplomatic, may have prompted various backers of the war to question how much longer the bloodshed could go on.
“Will that have an impact in accelerating the willingness for a political solution? We need to test it,” he said. “The Geneva consultations may be a good umbrella for testing that. It’s an occasion for asking everyone, including the government, if there is any new way that they are looking at a political solution, as they too claim they want.”
He said he would have a better assessment at the end of June, when he expects to wrap up his consultations. That coincides with the deadline for a final agreement in the Iran nuclear talks.
Whether a nuclear deal with Iran will pave the way for a new opening on peace talks in Syria remains to be seen. Increasingly, though, world leaders are explicitly linking the two, with the European Union’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, suggesting last week that a nuclear agreement could spur Tehran to play “a major but positive role in Syria.”
It could hardly come soon enough. Now in its fifth year, the Syrian war has claimed 220,000 lives, prompted an exodus of more than three million refugees and unleashed jihadist groups across the region. “This conflict is producing a question mark in many — where is it leading and whether this can be sustained,” Mr. de Mistura said.
Part Italian, part Swedish, Mr. de Mistura has worked with the United Nations for more than 40 years, but he is more widely known for his dapper style than for any diplomatic coups. Syria is by far the toughest assignment of his career — indeed, two of the organization’s most seasoned diplomats, Lakhdar Brahimi and Kofi Annan, tried to do the job and gave up — and critics have wondered aloud whether Mr. de Mistura is up to the task.
He served as a United Nations envoy in Afghanistan and Iraq, and before that in Lebanon, where a former minister recalled, with some scorn, that he spent many hours sunbathing at a private club in the hills above Beirut. Those who know him say he has a taste for fine suits and can sometimes speak too soon and too much, just as they point to his diplomatic missteps and hyperbole.
They cite, for instance, a news conference in October, when he raised the specter of Srebrenica, where thousands of Muslims were massacred in 1995 during the Balkans war, in warning that the Syrian border town of Kobani could fall to the Islamic State. In February, he was photographed at a party in Damascus, the Syrian capital, celebrating the anniversary of the Iranian revolution just as Syrian forces, aided by Iran, were pummeling rebel-held suburbs of Damascus; critics seized on that as evidence of his coziness with the government.
Mouin Rabbani, who served briefly as the head of Mr. de Mistura’s political affairs unit and has since emerged as one of his most outspoken critics, said Mr. de Mistura did not have the background necessary for the job. “This isn’t someone well known for his political vision or political imagination, and his closest confidants lack the requisite knowledge and experience,” Mr. Rabbani said.
As a deputy foreign minister in the Italian government, Mr. de Mistura was tasked in 2012 with freeing two Italian marines detained in India for shooting at Indian fishermen. He made 19 trips to India, to little effect. One marine was allowed to return to Italy for medical reasons; the other remains in India.
He said he initially turned down the Syria job when the United Nations secretary general approached him last August, only to change his mind the next day, after a sleepless, guilt-ridden night.
Mr. de Mistura compared his role in Syria to that of a doctor faced with a terminally ill patient. His goal in brokering a freeze in the fighting, he said, was to alleviate suffering. He settled on Aleppo as the location for its “fame,” he said, a decision that some questioned, considering that Aleppo was far trickier than the many other lesser-known towns where activists had negotiated temporary local cease-fires.
“Everybody, at least in Europe, are very familiar with the value of Aleppo,” Mr. de Mistura said. “So I was using that as an icebreaker.”
The cease-fire negotiations, to which he had devoted six months, fell apart quickly because of the government’s military offensive in Aleppo the very day of his announcement at the Security Council. Privately, United Nations diplomats said Mr. de Mistura had been manipulated. To this, Mr. de Mistura said only that he was “disappointed and concerned.”
Tarek Fares, a former rebel fighter, said after a recent visit to Aleppo that no Syrian would admit publicly to supporting Mr. de Mistura’s cease-fire proposal. “If anyone said they went to a de Mistura meeting in Gaziantep, they would be arrested,” is how he put it, referring to the Turkish city where negotiations between the two sides were held.
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon remains staunchly behind Mr. de Mistura’s efforts. His defenders point out that he is at the center of one of the world’s toughest diplomatic problems, charged with mediating a conflict in which two of the world’s most powerful nations — Russia, which supports Mr. Assad, and the United States, which has called for his ouster — remain deadlocked.
R. Nicholas Burns, a former State Department official who now teaches at Harvard, credited Mr. de Mistura for trying to negotiate a cease-fire even when the chances of success were exceedingly small — and the chances of a political deal even smaller. For his efforts to work, Professor Burns argued, the world powers will first have to come to an agreement of their own.
“He needs the help of outside powers,” he said. “It starts with backers of Assad. That’s Russia and Iran. De Mistura is there, waiting.”