Cari Paket Umroh Bersama Mamah Dedeh di Jakarta Hubungi 021-9929-2337 atau 0821-2406-5740 Alhijaz Indowisata adalah perusahaan swasta nasional yang bergerak di bidang tour dan travel. Nama Alhijaz terinspirasi dari istilah dua kota suci bagi umat islam pada zaman nabi Muhammad saw. yaitu Makkah dan Madinah. Dua kota yang penuh berkah sehingga diharapkan menular dalam kinerja perusahaan. Sedangkan Indowisata merupakan akronim dari kata indo yang berarti negara Indonesia dan wisata yang menjadi fokus usaha bisnis kami.

Cari Paket Umroh Bersama Mamah Dedeh di Jakarta Alhijaz Indowisata didirikan oleh Bapak H. Abdullah Djakfar Muksen pada tahun 2010. Merangkak dari kecil namun pasti, alhijaz berkembang pesat dari mulai penjualan tiket maskapai penerbangan domestik dan luar negeri, tour domestik hingga mengembangkan ke layanan jasa umrah dan haji khusus. Tak hanya itu, pada tahun 2011 Alhijaz kembali membuka divisi baru yaitu provider visa umrah yang bekerja sama dengan muassasah arab saudi. Sebagai komitmen legalitas perusahaan dalam melayani pelanggan dan jamaah secara aman dan profesional, saat ini perusahaan telah mengantongi izin resmi dari pemerintah melalui kementrian pariwisata, lalu izin haji khusus dan umrah dari kementrian agama. Selain itu perusahaan juga tergabung dalam komunitas organisasi travel nasional seperti Asita, komunitas penyelenggara umrah dan haji khusus yaitu HIMPUH dan organisasi internasional yaitu IATA.

Cari Paket Umroh Bersama Mamah Dedeh di Jakarta

Publik Indonesia rata-rata hanya mengenal dua jenis kopi, robusta (Coffea robusta) dan arabika (Coffea arabica).

Saco-Indonesia.com - Publik Indonesia rata-rata hanya mengenal dua jenis kopi, robusta (Coffea robusta) dan arabika (Coffea arabica). Namun, Indonesia sebenarnya memiliki satu jenis kopi lain yang tak kalah membuat penasaran, kopi liberika (Coffea liberica). Seperti apa kopi liberika?

Peneliti dan pencicip kopi dari Pusat Penelitian Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia (Puslitkoka) di Jember, Yusianto, mengatakan bahwa kopi liberika adalah kopi yang oleh masyarakat kerap disebut dengan "kopi ngongko (nangka)" dan memiliki citarasa unik.

"Kopi ini sering disebut kopi nongko karena bijinya yang besar-besar. kalau dirasakan, kopi ini ada citarasa sayurnya. Seperti kacang panjang mentah. kalau orang Sunda membuat karedok, ada sebagian rasa karedok yang bisa dirasakan di kopi ini," urai Yusianto.

Kopi liberika adalah kopi yang berasal dari wilayah Liberica, Afrika Barat. Kopi ini dibawa ke Indonesia pada abad 19 saat banyak tanaman kopi arabika saat itu terserang penyakit. Saat ini, kopi jenis ini ditanam di wilayah Jambi dan Bengkulu.

Berbeda dengan arabika dan robusta, tanaman kopi liberika berukuran besar, bisa mencapai tinggi 9 meter. Biji kopi liberika juga lebih besar, kadang mencapai dua kali lipat ukuran biji arabika. Yang unik, daun tanaman kopi ini mengandung kafein lebih banyak dari bijinya.

Yusianto mengatakan, kopi liberika adalah salah satu peluang Indonesia. Indonesia bisa mengembangkan jenis kopi liberika untuk diekspor. Saat ini, banyak orang yang belum mengenal jenis kopi ini.

"Kalau ada yang menganggap kopi ini tidak enak, itu hanya karena tidak kenal saja. tak kenal maka tak sayang. Makanya, kita harus kenalkan," katanya saat ditemui dalam acara Press Tour dan Media Gathering yang diadakan Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi, Jumat (17/5/2013).

Yusianto menilai, selain arabika, liberika potensial karena pasar ekspornya pun ada. Masyarakat negara tetangga, Malaysia, banyak yang mengonsumsi kopi jenis ini. Dari sisi harga, liberika juga lebih baik dari robusta. Budidaya dan pengembangan kopi liberika perlu dilakukan.
Editor :Liwon Maulana(galipat)
sumber:Kompas.com

    saco-indonesia.com,     tak mau sendiri kurindukan hadirmu     wahai cintak

    saco-indonesia.com,

    tak mau sendiri kurindukan hadirmu
    wahai cintaku kuingin ada cinta

    bagiku rasa cinta
    inilah yang membuat aku bahagia ...  oh
    bahagia ... oh
    berat ternyata pabila kusendiri
    terangnya hatiku pabila ada cinta

    dimana yang kucari
    dimana arah diri akan kuhempaskan

    kuingin cinta ingin kasih tak mau sendiri
    kuingin kamu bersama aku hingga ku tak sendiri
    berjuta kata yang indah pernah aku dengar
    tak seindah bila cintamu kau katakan

    ku tak mau sendiri

    dimana yang kucari
    dimana arah diri akan kuhempaskan

    kuingin cinta ingin kasih tak mau sendiri
    kuingin kamu bersama aku hingga ku tak sendiri
    berjuta kata yang indah pernah aku dengar
    tak  seindah bila cintamu kau katakan

    berjuta kata yang indah pernah aku dengar
    tak seindah bila cintamu kau katakan

    bagai cintaku


    Editor : Dian Sukmawati

 

WASHINGTON — During a training course on defending against knife attacks, a young Salt Lake City police officer asked a question: “How close can somebody get to me before I’m justified in using deadly force?”

Dennis Tueller, the instructor in that class more than three decades ago, decided to find out. In the fall of 1982, he performed a rudimentary series of tests and concluded that an armed attacker who bolted toward an officer could clear 21 feet in the time it took most officers to draw, aim and fire their weapon.

The next spring, Mr. Tueller published his findings in SWAT magazine and transformed police training in the United States. The “21-foot rule” became dogma. It has been taught in police academies around the country, accepted by courts and cited by officers to justify countless shootings, including recent episodes involving a homeless woodcarver in Seattle and a schizophrenic woman in San Francisco.

Now, amid the largest national debate over policing since the 1991 beating of Rodney King in Los Angeles, a small but vocal set of law enforcement officials are calling for a rethinking of the 21-foot rule and other axioms that have emphasized how to use force, not how to avoid it. Several big-city police departments are already re-examining when officers should chase people or draw their guns and when they should back away, wait or try to defuse the situation

Public perceptions of race relations in America have grown substantially more negative in the aftermath of the death of a young black man who was injured while in police custody in Baltimore and the subsequent unrest, far eclipsing the sentiment recorded in the wake of turmoil in Ferguson, Mo., last summer.

Americans are also increasingly likely to say that the police are more apt to use deadly force against a black person, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

The poll findings highlight the challenges for local leaders and police officials in trying to maintain order while sustaining faith in the criminal justice system in a racially polarized nation.

Sixty-one percent of Americans now say race relations in this country are generally bad. That figure is up sharply from 44 percent after the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown and the unrest that followed in Ferguson in August, and 43 percent in December. In a CBS News poll just two months ago, 38 percent said race relations were generally bad. Current views are by far the worst of Barack Obama’s presidency.

The negative sentiment is echoed by broad majorities of blacks and whites alike, a stark change from earlier this year, when 58 percent of blacks thought race relations were bad, but just 35 percent of whites agreed. In August, 48 percent of blacks and 41 percent of whites said they felt that way.

Looking ahead, 44 percent of Americans think race relations are worsening, up from 36 percent in December. Forty-one percent of blacks and 46 percent of whites think so. Pessimism among whites has increased 10 points since December.

Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are generally good or generally bad?
60
40
20
0
White
Black
May '14
May '15
Generally bad
Continue reading the main story
Do you think race relations in the United States are getting better, getting worse or staying about the same?
Getting worse
Staying the same
Getting better
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37
17
46
36
16
41
42
15

The poll finds that profound racial divisions in views of how the police use deadly force remain. Blacks are more than twice as likely to say police in most communities are more apt to use deadly force against a black person — 79 percent of blacks say so compared with 37 percent of whites. A slim majority of whites say race is not a factor in a police officer’s decision to use deadly force.

Overall, 44 percent of Americans say deadly force is more likely to be used against a black person, up from 37 percent in August and 40 percent in December.

Blacks also remain far more likely than whites to say they feel mostly anxious about the police in their community. Forty-two percent say so, while 51 percent feel mostly safe. Among whites, 8 in 10 feel mostly safe.

One proposal to address the matter — having on-duty police officers wear body cameras — receives overwhelming support. More than 9 in 10 whites and blacks alike favor it.

Continue reading the main story
How would you describe your feelings about the police in your community? Would you say they make you feel mostly safe or mostly anxious?
Mostly safe
Mostly anxious
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
75%
21
3
81
16
3
51
42
7
Continue reading the main story
In general, do you think the police in most communities are more likely to use deadly force against a black person, or more likely to use it against a white person, or don’t you think race affects police use of deadly force?
Police more likely to use deadly force against a black person
Police more likely to use deadly force against a white person
Race DOES NOT affect police use of deadly force
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
44%
37%
79%
2%
2%
1%
46%
53%
16%
9%
8%
4%
Continue reading the main story
Do you favor or oppose on-duty police officers wearing video cameras that would record events and actions as they occur?
Favor
Oppose
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
92%
93%
93%
6%
5%
5%
2%
2%
2%

Asked specifically about the situation in Baltimore, most Americans expressed at least some confidence that the investigation by local authorities would be conducted fairly. But while nearly two-thirds of whites think so, fewer than half of blacks agree. Still, more blacks are confident now than were in August regarding the investigation in Ferguson. On Friday, six members of the police force involved in the arrest of Mr. Gray were charged with serious offenses, including manslaughter. The poll was conducted Thursday through Sunday; results from before charges were announced are similar to those from after.

Reaction to the recent turmoil in Baltimore, however, is similar among blacks and whites. Most Americans, 61 percent, say the unrest after Mr. Gray’s death was not justified. That includes 64 percent of whites and 57 percent of blacks.

Continue reading the main story
As you may know, a Baltimore man, Freddie Gray, recently died after being in the custody of the Baltimore police. How much confidence do you have that the investigation by local authorities into this matter will be conducted fairly?
A lot
Some
Not much
None at all
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
29%
31
22
14
5
31
33
20
11
5
20
26
30
22
In general, do you think the unrest in Baltimore after the death of Freddie Gray was justified, or do you think the unrest was not justified?
Justified
Not justified
Don't know/No answer
All adults
Whites
Blacks
28%
61
11
26
64
11
37
57
6

Artikel lainnya »